内容摘要：“It is not always intentional censorship, but the outcome is still more censorship for us and our partners,” said Martha Dimitratou, cofounder of Repro Uncensored, an organization that monitors digital suppression of reproductive health content.

“It is not always intentional censorship, but the outcome is still more censorship for us and our partners,” said Martha Dimitratou, cofounder of Repro Uncensored, an organization that monitors digital suppression of reproductive health content.

A representative for the Idaho attorney general’s office didn’t immediately respond to an email seeking comment on the ruling.The state’s near-total ban currently makes performing an abortion a felony at any stage of pregnancy unless it is “necessary to prevent the death of the pregnant woman.”

Judge Jason Scott issued the ruling broadening the medical exception to the ban, allowing doctors to perform an abortion if “good faith medical judgment” shows a patient with an existing medical condition or pregnancy complication faces a risk of dying at some point without an abortion.The Center for Reproductive Rights said while people in dire circumstances will able to receive abortion care in Idaho, pregnant people with lethal fetal conditions don’t qualify unless the condition also poses a risk to the mother’s life.“Pregnant Idahoans whose health is in danger shouldn’t be forced to remain pregnant, and we are glad the court recognized that today. But this decision leaves behind so many people, including some of the women who brought this case,” said Gail Deady, a center staff attorney. “No one should have to choose between carrying a doomed pregnancy against their will or fleeing the state if they can.”

The center noted the judge’s ruling also prevents people at risk of death from self-harm due to mental health conditions from accessing abortion care.“It’s been an emotional rollercoaster hearing this decision,” plaintiff Jennifer Adkins said. “This cruel law turned our family tragedy into an unimaginable trauma. No one wants to learn that your baby has a deadly condition and will not survive, and that your own life is at risk on top of that.”

WASHINGTON (AP) — There are just two Planned Parenthood clinics in South Carolina, but every year they take hundreds of low-income patients who need things like contraception, cancer screenings and pregnancy testing.

The organization has long been at the center of the debate over abortion, but its clinics across the U.S. also provide a range of other services. In South Carolina, Medicaid patients often seek out Planned Parenthood because they often have difficulty finding a doctor who accepts the publicly funded insurance.La elección del papa León XIV como el primer líder de la Iglesia católica nacido en Estados Unidos lo puso en la posición extremadamente inusual y jurídicamente espinosa de ser ciudadano estadounidense y, al mismo tiempo, jefe de un Estado extranjero.

Nacido en Chicago en 1955 y bautizado con el nombre de Robert Prevost, durante la última década el nuevo papa ha tenido doble ciudadanía, la estadounidense y la peruana, el país latinoamericano en el que fue misionero y obispo.En el cargo de pontífice, León XIV es a la vez líder de la Santa Sede —el órgano rector de la Iglesia católica— y de la Ciudad del Vaticano, un Estado independiente.

¿Puede el papa seguir siendo estadounidense mientras encabeza un gobierno extranjero? A continuación presentamos algunas cosas a saber acerca de la ciudadanía de León XIV.Además de ser el líder espiritual de aproximadamente 1.400 millones de católicos en todo el mundo, según la Iglesia, León XIV también es el jefe de Estado de la nación más pequeña del planeta.